just in case...in http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectMetaTools
you have interesting packages like MethodWrappers. It sohuld be working in pharo.
cheers
mariano
2010/6/27 Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@hotmail.ca>Hi Laurent,
Perhaps I am missing something but you only need 2 conditions to detect what you are looking for:
1) changed method is a test (and defined in a subclass of TestCase)
2) changed method has a sender that is a test method
First Autotest versions have these two heuristics. Then I feel the need to add:
- change method is a setUp or tearDown -> run all tests of TestCase
- and now when there's no senders of changed method in a TestCase (a private method for example) -> try to find tests of the changed method class� (I think it can be better but I have no other solution yet)
Indeed, using Autotest I feel the need to be sure that the method I've changed has been called. I would like to see a warning if it's not the case.
Cheers
Laurent
�_______________________________________________
-----------------
Benoit St-Jean
A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero.
(Albert Einstein)
From: laurent.laffont@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:33:53 +0200
To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: [Pharo-project] Xtreme Pharo hacker needed :)Hi,I struggle for a functionality I want to add on Autotest. Suppose a class with two methods A and B, such as A senders of BZork>>methodA�� self methodBAnd unit tests:ZorkTest>>testSomething�� .....�� Zork new methodA��...��self assert: ....If I change methodA, Autotest detects it, search all senders of methodA in tests and run. As �ZorkTest>>testSomething is sender of�Zork>>methodA, it will find and run it.Now if I change methodB and there's no senders in tests, the previous heuristic won't work. So I added as last heuristic: if no method found, search all TestCases that references the changed method class and run.�So here it will find ZorkTest and run all its tests.�The problem is that I don't really know if the method I've changed has been actually "hit" by the tests. I just see that tests has been run. I don't know if my method has been called when running the tests.�So I want to detect this.One way of doing this seems to use MethodContext>>runSimulated:contextAtEachStep:. I've found this looking at MessageTally. Is it the best solution ?So in Autotest>>findRunAndShowTestsOf: I try something like thisAutotest>>findRunAndShowTestsOf:changedMethod��| testMethods aTestResult methodHit |��"Finds the test related to changedMethod, run them and tell the view to update"testMethods := search methodsFor: changedMethod.methodHit := false.thisContext senderrunSimulated: [aTestResult := runner run: testMethods]�contextAtEachStep: [:current| �(current method = changedMethod) � �"<--- here I detect if changedMethod has been hit"�� � � ifTrue: [methodHit := true]].�� � � �.....but using this debugger opens with "SimulationGuardException: triggered by BlockClosure>>newProcess" in MethodContext>>doPrimitive:method:receiver:args:�As I don't (yet :) understand all this stuff, I want to know if it's the right way to do it and what should I check.Thanks
Laurent Laffont
http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/
http://magaloma.blogspot.com/
Enter for a chance to get your town photo on Bing.ca! Submit a Photo Now!
Pharo-project mailing list
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project