On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:01:24 +0100, Diogenes Moreira <diogenes.moreira@gmail.com> wrote:

I think the third option is clearer than the others.

I agree, but I'd use a "real" prefix, exactly the same characters at the beginning, every time.

So that would become: reefAsView, reefAsCallback.

In my own code, I prefix selectors sometimes and always as real prefixes.

But I would use an abbreviation for the project/"namespace" prefix

instead of something that could be a word, so that the prefix stands out more.

So that might become: rfAsView, rfAsCallback.

Cheers,

Peter

Best Regards

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,
I'm having some doubts about how to call some methods for Reef. To be precise, I'm not sure about the naming og the method extensions I'm adding.
For instance, I have an extension for Object, the method #asView, and some others in BlockClosure, #asCallback, asCallbackOn:, etc.

So... I want to ask which naming convention is better.

1) Just let the methods like now?
2) adding a prefix, like reView, reCallback, etc.?
3) adding a full name prefix, asReefView, asReefCallback, etc.?

What do you think?

Cheers,
Esteban