DeafXDeaf suggesting "an X that's non reactive as you would normally expect"On Nov 21, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote:I totally agree. Dummy does not tell me about the class.Are there just 3 uses of Dummy in the core?We should either use Null or use a specific prefix always, so its form a consisten pattern.DummyUIManager -> NullUIManager
FernandoOn Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
From what I understand, Dummy means something different. I have using that for class names. More accurate names can be found.
I would rename:
DummyUIManager -> HeadlessUIManager
DummySystemProgressItem -> NullSystemProgressItem
DummySoundSystem -> NullSoundSystem
what do you think? do you have better names?
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com