2015-03-24 15:16 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

On 24 Mar 2015, at 14:29, kilon alios <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:

There is a big diffirence between Morphic and the other. Morphic is a full solution and mature one as well. The others , with the exception of Bloc , try to wrap things up or offering better solution to some areas. 

The one thing I don't understand is why improving Morphic or even redesigning it is not even on the table. Looks to me like the least painful scenario. Unless thats the intention of Bloc to be the next generation of Morphic. In that case I am all for Bloc.

if you read my mail, you will notice that I said BOTH are on the table (and we are actually moving oon both): 
- Bloc is the redesign
- In the mean time we WORK and ENCOURAGE others to work on improve it.

but Morphic it self has several fundamental flaws that cannot be fixed and that’s why in the long, very long way, needs to be replaced.

One of the problem is that the Morphic replacement will probably be less than Morphic was (or was intended to be) :(

You'll probably tell me that for the kind of work we're doing in UI with Pharo, we don't need the power of Morphic and I'd agree with you.

Still, I will miss the demise of Morphic.

Thierry