On 13 Nov 2019, at 10:05, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:On 13 Nov 2019, at 09:04, ducasse <stepharo@netcourrier.com> wrote:I vote to remove it.
Hi
In the new implementation of the code formattter I will remove useTraditionalPrecedence.
This settings put additional parentheses around binary selector but I find it cumbersome
While it may make sense for
it turns
foo
^ 1 + 2 * 3
into
foo
^ (1 + 2) * 3
foo
^ 1 * 3 + 2
foo
^ (1 | 2) % 3
foo
^ 1 % 2 | 3
So let me know what you think but I will be hard to convince :)
The RB AST encodes parenthesis information, so that means that we can have
a pretty printer keeping the parenthesis if they have been added by the original author.
Adding new ones makes no sense to me.
So I vote to remove.
Marcus