Speaking of which, I'd love to have a go at targeting EmscriptenWe can do this by using llvm-gcc producing bitcode.It may not be too hard to compile things, of course, the next challenge is with all the display and I/O.But if they can do Unreal3, MESS emulators, and Commodore Emulators, we should be able to do a PharoVM.PhilOn Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:Actually, do I want to have Pharo running on Java? My answer was �yes� a couple of years before. Today, I want to have Pharo (or at least most of it) running in a web browser.
Distributing applications to clients is then so easy...
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Nov 24, 2013, at 6:19 PM, askoh <askoh@askoh.com> wrote:
> http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/09/the-second-coming-of-java/
>
> The article talks about Java Virtual Machine running dynamic languages like
> Scala and Clojure in addition to Java. What prevents the Smalltalk Virtual
> Machine from running Java, Scala, Clojure and other JVM languages? Is that
> something we can ride on to greater awareness and usage of Smalltalk Virtual
> Machine and Smalltalk?
>
> All the best,
> Aik-Siong Koh
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Second-Coming-of-Java-article-tp4724932.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>