Sorry but reading code is really important and now assistant is
taking too much space.
for me code is as important as the other functionality.
the size of the code area (and the default size of the browser) can be easily increased, if needed.
And your proposal does not take into account hierarchy and I use it
all the time.
my ���proposal��� is just a fast sketch made to illustrate how I would like to show certain functionality, it does not take into account any other functionality��� If I finish my browser proposal ever, it will have a lot more buttons in the toolbar :)
about hierarchy I think it should spawn a new browser, as before��� but it is still something we need to play with it.
The same way we use all the time variables.
*we* use them all the time, but most people does not use them never :)
anyway: an option in a tab is one click, same as with a button: not hard��� and we can play with the information we show in auxiliary panels better :)
Esteban
Stef
Le 19/8/15 11:50, Esteban Lorenzano a
��crit :
yes, of course you are right :)
the GTools guys are working in a complete replacement, and
I���m sure it will be a lot better��� but we will always need a
backdoor��� and I would like to have a good browser even as a
backdoor.
(also, our philosophy is incremental: we improve what we
have while we wait for the break-thru improvements)
Esteban
ps: for me the ���code area��� is not equivalent to the ���work
area���: I spend much more time understanding a problem than
coding it, and for that a view of the method *in the context* is
better)