> On 21 Apr 2015, at 14:37, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
>
> On 21/04/15 13:14, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
>> nope, solution is to explicit version to load :)
>
> Explicit symbolic version, that is.
> Never a fixed number, as that can't be patched.
> That breaks the update process just as well.

no… explicit fixed number. I need version 1.0.42, not #stable or #myCoolFantasyNumberWichAfterAllIsEqualButWorstTo-1-0-42
And of course can be patched…. with version 1.0.43.

That’s the only way to be able to make the update process work.

Esteban

>
> Stephan
>
>