Hi!

To make things clearer:

License Problem: There is a community project with many former contributors. They all gave away their code for a idea of a free to use smalltalk.
This now is renamed to Pharo by one of those contributors. Now some of those contributors offer support for that platform.

If i were one of the former contributors. Who should i accuse for license infringement? Stef as one of the renamers? No. All other contributors? No.

I have no idea, what person i could accuse. Who ever will be accused - Every judge will confirm, that nobody is responsable. Neither for renaming the project, nor for having contributed code.

This is the problem for many companies, who own software patents. Free Software ... there is nobody, they can claim for patent infringement. Linux - who could be accused? Linus? No. Redhat? No. Novell. No. IBM? No. In what country? What court is in charge, in what country, what town? Anybody knows.

So the free software community gives a shit on software patents, rights infringement. IBM is laughing at all hostile lawyers. They can prove in front of court, that all ideas in Linux have already been there in one of their former operating systems. Nothing new. And Linux becomes more and more popular.

BSD, GNU, License...who really cares? Richard, yes. But not in case of Pharo. All open source. So, theoretically seen, question of license is important, practically not.

You want to offer commercial software pakets with NDA? Closed Source? With RUNTIME-Licenses? Oh, yes. Very successful business models of the past. Not for the future.

But - i can tell you, who will be suffering. Cincom. They are will be under pressure by Pharo. You will have to scramble the image, like many commercial Smalltalks do, to prevent disassembly.

One of the great advantages of Squeak is, you can find code for everything in there. Even for sending SMS over Nokia mobiles. Ok, far from being perfect. But it worked once upon a time. That code you removed ... bad idea!

>From Pharo I expect:
And a BIG BANG.