Thanks Nicolas!



On 2017-11-06 11:30, Nicolas Cellier wrote:

Oh yes, you're right,
the SqueakSLL could have been built but was not built in pharo...
I just changed https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/edit/Cog/build.win64x64/pharo.cog.spur/plugins.ext
this should trigger another automated build and if all goes well you will have a new bintray artefact to test.

2017-11-06 10:21 GMT+01:00 Raffaello Giulietti <raffaello.giulietti@lifeware.ch <mailto:raffaello.giulietti@lifeware.ch>>:

�� �� Hi Nicolas,

�� �� I tried both the vm found at the location you mention (dated
�� �� 2017-10-22):

�� �� https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/download_file?file_path=cog_win64x64_pharo.cog.spur_201710221351.zip
�� �� <https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/download_file?file_path=cog_win64x64_pharo.cog.spur_201710221351.zip>

�� �� and the "official" latest vm on the Pharo site (dated 2017-11-01)

�� �� http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur64/win/pharo-win-x86_64-201711010928-e14fbab.zip
�� �� <http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur64/win/pharo-win-x86_64-201711010928-e14fbab.zip>



�� �� Neither of them contains the SqueakSSL.dll and, in fact, in both
�� �� cases I get an exception when using Gofer to download Roassal2,
�� �� using the latest 60519 image:

�� �� Gofer it
�� �� ���� �� smalltalkhubUser: 'ObjectProfile' project: 'Roassal2';
�� �� ���� �� configurationOf: 'Roassal2';
�� �� ���� �� loadDevelopment

�� �� This works on Pharo 32 bit/Win, where SquekSSL is present.








�� �� On 2017-11-04 23:31, Nicolas Cellier wrote:

�� �� �� �� Note that win64 SSL works at least since
�� �� �� �� https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/commit/baa70862014d3bb510f2edf7465e857c645be0e4
�� �� �� �� <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/commit/baa70862014d3bb510f2edf7465e857c645be0e4>
�� �� �� �� and
�� �� �� �� https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/commit/caa8241de11b99ecaea5236b3d3e3c0d303c6eb4
�� �� �� �� <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/commit/caa8241de11b99ecaea5236b3d3e3c0d303c6eb4>

�� �� �� �� Maybe it's a bit too recent to be found in official Pharo
�� �� �� �� distribution, but if you can live with bleeding edge, pick a
�� �� �� �� more recent VM here:
�� �� �� �� https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201710221351#files
�� �� �� �� <https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201710221351#files>
�� �� �� �� (or maybe you can find one from the Pharo site?)


�� �� �� �� 2017-11-04 22:21 GMT+01:00 henry <henry@callistohouse.club
�� �� �� �� <mailto:henry@callistohouse.club
�� �� �� �� <mailto:henry@callistohouse.club>>>:

�� �� �� �� ���� �� This is the advantage of in-image SSL solution, found in the
�� �� �� �� ���� �� Cryptography repository:

�� �� �� �� http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography.html
�� �� �� �� <http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography.html>
�� �� �� �� ���� �� <http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography.html
�� �� �� �� <http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography.html>>

�� �� �� �� ���� �� Sent from ProtonMail Mobile


�� �� �� �� ���� �� On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:53, Raffaello Giulietti
�� �� �� �� ���� �� <raffaello.giulietti@lifeware.ch
�� �� �� �� <mailto:raffaello.giulietti@lifeware.ch>

�� �� �� �� ���� �� <mailto:raffaello.giulietti@lifeware.ch
�� �� �� �� <mailto:raffaello.giulietti@lifeware.ch>>> wrote:

�� �� �� �� �� �� ���� �� Hi, the SqueakSSL dll is not included in the Pharo
�� �� �� �� �� �� 64bit/Win vm
�� �� �� �� �� �� ���� �� distribution. I guess this has to do with problems in
�� �� �� �� �� �� building it.
�� �� �� �� �� �� ���� �� Anybody knows where the difficulties lie? Greetings
�� �� �� �� �� �� Raffaello