Well... functional programming is hard and not everybody really understands it... structured programming is hard and not everybody really understood it... hmm at the end, programming is hard :-)

He gives no reason about his stament nor "demonstration" of it neither... so he has a feeling, me too and a completely different one :-)




On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Janko Miv��ek <janko.mivsek@eranova.si> wrote:
Hi guys,

Again one interesting topic for this weekend to discuss. David Nolen, a
Lisp and JavaScript guy posted in his blog an article titled Illiterate
Programming [1] where he said:

"...Yet I think Smalltalk still fundamentally failed (remember this is a
programming language originally designed to scale from children to
adults) because *Objects are really hard* and no-one really understands
to this day how to do them right...."

He links to Alan Kay post [2] back in 1998 where he talks about problems
with inheritance:

"Here are a few problems in the naive inheritance systems we use today:
confusions of Taxonomy and Parentage, of Specialization and Refinement,
of Parts and Wholes, of Semantics and Pragmatics..."

Let we concentrate on broader "Objects are really hard and no-one really
understands to this day how to do them right" claim and not merely
inheritance, please.

Best regards
Janko

[1] http://dosync.posterous.com/illiterate-programming
[2]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/1998-April/009261.html

--
Janko Miv��ek
Aida/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si




--
Hern��n Wilkinson
Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching
Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207
email: hernan.wilkinson@10Pines.com
site:��http://www.10Pines.com
Address: Paraguay��523, Floor 7 N, Buenos Aires, Argentina