Hi Torsten,I like all this cleanups and recategorizations.But I have two requests, tell me what you think:��- first and more important. I'd like that we define a convention document in a wiki page or pillar document for protocols. What are the correct protocols to use and why? This is important for newcomers and for making tools. I see that you're doing a lot of recategorizations but I'd like if we set them up and discuss them in the mailing list.��- second and more technological. Why are all categorizations splitted in mini pull requests, scoped to one class? Can we group them at least by package? otherwise this is killing our integration infrastructure (which is modest but for free :)). Also separating all this changes means that we cannot easily find them in the history later on, I'd prefer that we group related changes in related commits if possible.�� Marcus was telling me this may be because people have trouble reviewing them if they are too big? I can review if you put me ask me as reviewer.Tx,GuilelOn Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Astares <notifications@github.com> wrote:https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/ca
ses/21646/AbstractFileReferenc e-should-use-utilities- protocol-name
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
����https://github.com/pharo-pro
ject/pharo/pull/1149 Commit Summary
- 21646 AbstractFileReference should use "utilities" protocol name
File Changes
Patch Links:
- https://github.com/pharo-proje
ct/pharo/pull/1149.patch - https://github.com/pharo-proje
ct/pharo/pull/1149.diff ���
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.--
������
Guille Polito
Research Engineer
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189
French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr
Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13