On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
In this respect an old implementation was much nicer in a sense that
it could be replaced by different stream which responds to same
protocol..
But now, Transcript is a class, and its much harder to replace it and
as to me it is too hardwired.
Maybe this is good for Cuis, but as to me, i consider Transcript as a
generic/default logging facility in smalltalk system.
I was planning to redirect Transcript to write to stdout when in
headless mode (and when VMs will provide stdio communication out of
the box).
But how i suppose to do it now? Hacking existing class? And then
again, what if someone wants to redirect transcript to socket (and its
easy to imagine where we may need that - suppose you working with
remote image and want to see its transcript).
So, hacking the same class again?

I'm�probably missing the point but: why can't you do something like this:?

transcript := Smalltalk at: #Transcript.
Smalltalk at: #Transcript put: somethingElse.
Smalltalk at: #Transcript put: transcript.

Cheers,
Richo

P.S. i know that maybe a preferable way to do logging is through 'self
log:' protocol etc..
but lets face reality: there are a tons of code in system which using
Transcript. �And i don't think that we will abandon it in nearest
future.
So, lets just keep it and make it more nicer, but lets separate concerns.


--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.