On Jun 17, 2009, at 13:37 , St�phane Ducasse wrote:

> I would really like that we do not lose it.
> May be lukas we should tagged them
> We should check the SunitExtension of keith to see if he has something
> to support
> supposed to fail tests.

We have this already: #expectedFailures.

Adrian

>
> On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>
>>> The point remains:some well known failing tests that won't be
>>> solved should
>>> go in known failures.
>>
>> Yes, agreed. I thought a fix would soon be available, but that
>> doesn't
>> seem the case.
>>
>> Anyway, most Smalltalk choke on these tests.
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project