On May 23, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
> Ok, I will check that first... The last core image is 10304cl?
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM, St�phane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr
> > wrote:
> Excellent!
> Gabriel what I suggest you to do is to check if the previous author is
> not a person that signed the agreement (Squeak + pharo)
> Often what we see is that some method got changes for a simple fix in
> comment or formatting.
>
> Stef
>
> On May 23, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > I will start on re-writting this methods:
> >
> > Number>>reciprocal
> > Fraction class>>one
> > Fraction>>reciprocal
> > Float class>>one
> > Float>>reciprocal
> > Integer class>>one
> >
> > All of this are almost trivial to re-write so I think it's a good
> > start point. My plan is to first write a test case covering this,
> > delete the old method (if present) and re-implement it.
> >
> > I signed the License Agrement on Friday and sent an scanned copy to
> > Stephane by e-mail (probably he still doesn't update the list).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gabriel
> >
> > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Adrian Lienhard <
adi@netstyle.ch>
> > wrote:
> > Hi Gabriel,
> >
> > On May 23, 2009, at 19:55 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > There is somebody coordinating the re-write of non re-licensed
> > > methods?
> >
> > As I started working on it last week, I can coordinate.
> >
> > > I probably could re-write some of this methods but don't want to
> > > duplicate
> > > the effort :)
> >
> > Great!
> >
> > > Should I take the Pharo-Core image or the Pharo-Dev for this?
> >
> > The core image.
> >
> > I already fixed more than half of the methods. What is left can be
> > seen here:
> >
> >
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ResultofRelicensing.
> >
> > I suggest that whoever starts working on a set of methods
> announces it
> > on this mailing list. Like this we don't get a conflict. The easiest
> > thing is to produce a change set and then attach it to the issue:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=842
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> > BTW, I don't see you on the list of OK committers. Did you sign the
> > agreement? Else your changes will reappear on the list of non-clean
> > methods! ;)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> >
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> >
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project