Hi.

2016-08-18 9:34 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:

withExtension: aString

�� "Returns a new file reference with a different file extension"

�� <exp: '/tmp/file.txt' asFileReference withExtension: 'log'

�� value: '/tmp/file.log' asFileReference >

�� ^ self withPath: (self path withExtension: aString)

So let me know what you think.
�� - tell me that we have already test unit (yes the ones I wrote too)
�� => they do not have the same purpose

I am sorry, but I want to said it: we have tests. Why tests are not for same purpose? (I would say they include it).

As Tudor said:��

"they are way too disconnected from the code"

And this needs to be solved.

We already have nice feature in Nautilus: it shows "test icon" on covered methods. We could extends this idea to simplify test visibility.��

Proposed solution is much simpler. But how much it is practical? How many code could use it?��

For simple cases like String methods is super nice. But could you imaging it for Seaside code? or Morphic?��