Why not a small popup placed correctly ?

Then it doesn't even corrupt your source code

Ben

On Oct 18, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:

That is the first step :), if you have a decent text editor,

you could add a real print-it or do-it token, which is not regarged as source code, but just
as meta information. I think we could quite easily do this in Amber right now ;).

But yes, why not, sounds like a reasonable idea to put print-its and compilation errors in double quotes.


On 2013-10-18, at 14:59, btc@openinworld.com wrote:

Just a random idea flitting thought my mind... �When trying to <Accept> some code with an error in it, the error message gets inserted into the code such that it screws up syntax highlighting and also you need to use <Undo> to remove it. �I wonder if the error might be inserted between double-quotes making it a comment. �The same could be said for if you <PrintIt> from a debugger. �It seems such a simple and obvious idea that I presume its been considered before and there are good reasons not to do it. �I am curious what others think might be the pros/cons of it.
In the case of <PrintIt> one benefit might be that the code could still be saved, with the result left as a kind-of example. �This might be good for temporary code development in a Workspace.

cheers -ben