maybe :)�<div>I use #with: a lot, but I agree that one of the two approaches is wrong... it should be a coherent API.<div><br></div><div>Esteban<br><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Damien Cassou <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:damien.cassou@gmail.com" target="_blank">damien.cassou@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Esteban Lorenzano &lt;<a href="mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com">estebanlm@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

&gt; Dictionary withAll: {#one-&gt;1 with: #two-&gt;2}<br>
<br>
</div>your #with: is suspicious :-)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Damien Cassou<br>
<a href="http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st" target="_blank">http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st</a><br>
<br>
&quot;Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them<br>
popular by not having them.&quot; James Iry<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>