2014-11-18 23:00 GMT+01:00 Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de>:
Hi Nicolai,

For��https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14427��(renaming CompressionTests) and https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14426 (BaloonTests)��it worked without a problem.

yes? there are still merge conflicts (for the monkey).
��

For others I got the mentioned merge conflict now from the monkey validation.��

I tried manually using Monticello tools and it seems that the manual merge fails in 40374 because PSMCChangesGrouper #visitClassTraitDefinition: gives a DNU which another problem.

But not for all.
(I saw this on�� other slices too, some time ago.)


��

I opened a new issue for this:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14494/PSMCChangesGrouper-is-missing-visitClassTraitDefinition

and I provide a naive fix.��

If possible someone should review #14494 or help with the others. Anyone some Banana to feed to the monkey?
��
Thx
T.
��

Gesendet:��Dienstag, 18. November 2014 um 22:50 Uhr
Von:��"Nicolai Hess" <nicolaihess@web.de>
An:��"Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>
Cc:��"Torsten Bergmann" <astares@gmx.de>
Betreff:��Merge conflict for "META Case: restructure Tests and test packages"

for example : https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14433[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14433]
��I don't why there is a merge conflict, maybe it is how the slice is created.I think the restructuring (moving all classes from
XXXTest to XXX-Tests) would work if we delete the empty XXXTests package before
creating the slice.

nicolai