Le 16/8/15 17:00, Sean P. DeNigris a ��crit :
> stepharo wrote
>> you get a project (group) with all your packages together ready to work ;)
> Cool! I feel more and more that the standard "Package" pane is only useful
> for... packaging, and when one takes off the dependency management hat and
> puts the user hat on (i.e. most of the time), what you really want there is
> a logical view of the system. So I see three use cases:
> - Logical view of the system - I guess this was the original intention of
> Categories, but has been hijacked by Monticello
> - By project - which, as you just showed, we have now, yay!
> - By package - the least useful, but primary (up til now), view

Indeed.
We will see what we get at the end but may be something like

�� �� ��MyProject
�� �� ��AnotherProject
�� �� ��System
�� �� ��LowLevel

And people will not be overwhelmed by hundreds of nice packages. :)

I think that touching package contents under the assumption that the
package list is too long in the UI
is the wrong way to look at the problem.
�� �� ��Packages are unit of deployment and we need Projects - unit of
knowledge. And the UI should shows both
�� �� ��depending on the view we want to get.

Stef
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Projects-are-slowly-getting-to-live-and-tp4843277p4843286.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>