On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Christophe Demarey <christophe.demarey@inria.fr> wrote:

Good job Denis!

Le 24 mars 2016 �� 17:48, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> a ��crit :

Hello.

I finished new version of Ghost:
Abstract proxy classes uses Ghost name instead of Proxy: there are GHObjectGhost and GHClassGhost.
GHProxyHandler renamed to GHGhostBehaviour. Concrete ghosts should implement #ghostBehaviour instead of #proxyHandler.
Why did you rename these classes?
I find the new names obscure and they do not provide a clue of what is the purpose of the class. Old names were clear and easily understandable.

I agree here. I originally called the tool Ghost mostly because I wanted TRANSPARENT proxies for all kind of objects (included classes, methods, etc), and LIGHTWEIGHT.�� So...I thought that Ghost were transparent and lightweight hahahaha.��

But... one thing is the project name and the other is class names. Here I agree with Christophe that I prefer the old names. Same as for the virus stuff. I would not go that deep into the metaphor.��

Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com