(see issueother ideas how to handle this?removed on purpose.I don't want to move this display underline/strikethrough code into LogicalFont if it was�� bold or italic, others like underline and strikethrough are ignored with the comment:- setting the emphasis on LogicalFont is only propagated to the realfont if emphasis isfor tree and listrenderer (and AFAIK only checks the first text entry element for the used emphasis)- We have some code for drawing the underline/strikethrough, but it is only usedSome questions:- Did this ever work�� ?
"we only handle bold and italic here since underline/strikeout are drawn separately"No "underline" or "stroke out" emphasis on FT fonts)
nicolai��