> I agree with Hern�n. OB is incredibly valuable, and I was delighted to
> see that it was included out of the box in 1.2 (when switching to
> Pharo from Squeak). We cannot let it slide or remove it (btw, I still
> can't believe we as a community let SeasideTesting be broken in 1.2).
>
> Hern�n -- I would love to offer any sort of help maintaining it. I
> don't know much about GUI/Morphic coding, though of course I'd like to
> learn. But I would definitely be willing to help test it, etc.
>
> ~Dmitri
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Hern�n Morales Durand
> <
hernan.morales@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just to give some feedback because I mostly use the core image. OB is
>> one of our most valuable tools, it would be a pity if cannot be
>> integrated.
>> I could help mantaining but not alone, I'm sick of programming in isolation.
>>
>> Hern�n
>>
>> 2011/2/2 St�phane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>:
>>> Ok so far no reaction.
>>> So may be we should remove OB from 1.2 dev?
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>>> Lukas will not maintain OB for Pharo 1.2 and personnally I will not do it because I do not have the knowledge and the time.
>>>> So now this is time to know what do we do for OmniBrowser. I have all my ears open.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The first step I would do
>>>> � � � - host OB for 1.1 in a repository where we have write access.
>>>> � � � - create a configurationOf for OB and save it there
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>