On 2 June 2011 14:51, Norbert Hartl <
norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
>
> Am 02.06.2011 um 14:31 schrieb Mariano Martinez Peck:
>
> Thanks Norbert. Now I could successfully run benchmarks for SIXX and compare
> with Fuel. But that's not really fare because we are comparing a text based
> serializer against a binary one.
>
> It is interesting anyway. I like to know if it is 20 times faster or even
> more. On the other hand it is not fair either. I don't know fuel but I think
> it platform dependent, right? So it is not fair the other way round because
> you compare a cross-platform serializer with a platform-dependent one ;) I
> think these are the categories that people think about when the are about to
> choose what util to use.
> Norbert
>
> Mariano
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Norbert Hartl <
norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
>>
>> Am 02.06.2011 um 11:42 schrieb Mariano Martinez Peck:
>>
>> >> serialize: anObject on: aStream
>> ��� | sws |
>> ��� sws := SixxWriteStream on: aStream.
>> ��� sws nextPut: anObject.
>> ��� sws close.
>>
>> serialize: anObject on: aStream
>> �� anObject sixxOn: aStream
>>
>> >> materializeFrom: aStream
>> ��� | srs objects |
>> ��� srs := SixxReadStream on: aStream.
>> ��� objects := srs contents.
>> ��� srs close.
>> ��� ^ objects
>>
>> materializeFrom: aStream
>> ^ Object readSixxFrom: aStream
>> Norbert
>>
>>
>>
>> Is that correct or I am doing it wrong?� All I want to do is to serialize
>> a graph into a stream.
>>
>> The stream I am using is or this:
>>
>> (FileDirectory default forceNewFileNamed:� 'Bench')
>>
>> or
>>
>> (RWBinaryOrTextStream on: '')
>>
>>
>> I am not sure if I should be doing a #nextPut: or a #nextPutAll:. I mean,
>> sometimes anObject is a collection and sometimes it is not. So, which one
>> should I use?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mariano
>>
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
>
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>
>
>