On 24.10.2014, at 15:06, kilon alios <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:very niceso any more information to this, how exactly this optimization works and which kind of data will benefit from this ?��Cl��ment���s byte code set talk at ESUG:��http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9J362QHwSA&index=64&list=PLJ5nSnWzQXi_6yyRLsMMBqG8YlwfhvB0XCl��ment���s Sista talk at ESUG (2 parts):Eliot���s Spur talk at ESUG (3 parts):On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:remarkable!!!
congratulations for the impressive results
thanks for sharing!
sebastian
o/
> On 23/10/2014, at 17:40, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For those of you who missed this on IRC:
>
> henriksp: estebanlm: Care to run a small bench Cog vs Spur for me?
> [3:32pm] henriksp: int := ZnUTF8Encoder new.
> [3:32pm] henriksp: [int decodeBytes:#[67 97 115 104 44 32 108 105 107 101 32 226 130 172 44 32 105 115 32 107 105 110 103 0]] bench.
> [3:32pm] henriksp: had a 16x speedup with assembly implementation vs Cog, if it's 8x vs Spur, that's just really impressive
> [3:44pm] Craig left the chat room. (Quit: Leaving.)
> [3:53pm] Craig joined the chat room.
> [4:08pm] VitamineD joined the chat room.
> [4:20pm] estebanlm: checking
> [4:21pm] estebanlm: Cog: 167,000 per second.
> [4:22pm] estebanlm: Cog[Spur]: 289,000 per second.
> [4:23pm] estebanlm: henriksp: ping
> [4:33pm] tinchodias left the chat room. (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
> [4:33pm] tinchodias joined the chat room.
> [4:34pm] henriksp: 70% more work done, nice!
> [5:09pm]
>
>
> Yay! :)