2009/1/20 Damien Pollet <damien.pollet@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 00:47, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My first reaction is "why is it not Smalltalk?"  Not the name, but the language itself.  Is there something I missed/should read to understand it?
>
> +1 , i don't understand too, what makes 'scripting' in smalltalk too
> different than writing in smalltalk :)

Smalltalk only has syntax for method bodies, it lacks a (practical)
one for declaring packages/classes/categories/method declarations in a
single block of text.

Ok, you add some convenience methods in order to declare packages/classes/ ... more easily, but the syntax is still the same ?


--
Serge Stinckwich
IRD - UR 079 Geodes, MSI Team, Hanoi, Vietnam
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
http://doesnotunderstand.org/