Hi G�ran:
Sorry by my intromision here, but want to say somethings :)
Hi!
Right, discussion is good. And believe me - the squeak-dev community is
Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>> So you are educating them....
>> Frankly I stopped trying long time ago.
>
> No, I just tell them what I think is necessary to move forward.
> Other may be more educated here, it is just sharing MHO so others
> can to form an own opinion.
NOT oblivious to the needs of a package system. I mean, come on,
Monticello, SqueakMap, Universes etc etc - it all was around before
Pharo was born.
What I have seen so far in Metacello is indeed nothing new - the
senarios and discussions about dependencies etc go loooong way back.
> I therefore would really like to see a common exchange mechanism usedEhm, "a more modular system" has been on the table since... hell, way
> on both sides.
>
> I'm sure I'm not able to convince one or the other to use package
> systems like Metacello but at least I hope to make them think about
> the need of a more modular system.
back to Squeak 3.3! And yeah, even earlier of course - you can probably
track it back to PARC if you try hard. :) :)
Anyway, "common exchange mechanism" - I am working on Deltastreams which
I even presented at Brest, though unfortunately colliding with the
Seaside tutorial. Deltas and Deltastreams are indeed focused on EXACTLY
this problem (fork interchange), and it was born in 2007:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2007-August/119471.html
I and Igor are the ones working on it - and after Brest we have had very
little time to move it forward. I still think it is a very important
piece of the puzzle though.