> Why? In mathematics the symbol ~ is used for equivalence. To me (and I think any newcomer to Smalltalk) the first guess of the meaning of ~= is equivalent to => missed. The meaning is totally different: "Answer whether the receiver and the argument do not represent the same object.���
On 26.06.2014, at 10:15, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make a suggestion that may lead to a long debate but let's go: What do you think about deprecating ~= and replace it with != for example?
+1
But then I also want to suggest #!== for negating identity.
>
> I never used this method because it is too confusing for me. I prefer to use (a = b) not or (a = b) ifFalse:.
> So, the discussion is open ...
>
> Christophe