Hi.

First of all: thank you for the feedback Damien!
It makes sense, the rule also has higher amount of negative feedback. I will remove it from QA, let it stay in the image, it actually can be useful.

Uko

> On 17 Sep 2015, at 06:49, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> This lint rule pops up all the times and my code is always ok. I
> typically have to reference an abstract class when:
>
> - the abstract class takes care of choosing the concrete class to
>�� instantiate
>
> - the abstract class takes care of some shared variable for its
>�� subclasses (e.g., a cache or an shared external object)
>
> I propose to remove this rule which has never been useful for me.
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>
> "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
> losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
>