On Mar 12, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Hi,

I understand and encourage the streamlining of efforts. And I have no problem with dealing with the bumps of living on the latest version, be it the VM or the image.

But, please consider the point of view of the one that offers the feedback. Right now, it sounds as if you are shooting down an unreasonable request from Stephan, but in this case, Esteban suggested that we should use the Cog VM instead of the Pharo VM to develop Moose, given that the Pharo VM is basically broken for us.

So, Stephan did exactly that: he used the Cog VM. He reported that the tests do not crash the VM, which I think should be a relevant input, and he also reported other problems while running on the Cog VM. These errors indeed seem to be related to FileSystem, and this just shows that using the Cog VM as a temporary solution does not work. So, we have to focus on the Pharo VM.

doru do you have an idea of the tests that crash the vm?

And now, I am back to the original question: What other tests or experiments would you like us to do to help with identifying the problem?

Cheers,

Doru

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:

FileDialogs apparently make use of the new FileSystem values, so yes,
the update-our-VM-warning is there for a good reason!

On 2013-03-12, at 16:47, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:

> The problem is not just with the MOOSE image,
> Pharo 20598 and Cog.app 2071 doesn't allow a
> file dialog to be opened.
>
> FileDialogWindow new open
>
> Stephan
>

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"