Hi,
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>> We can change it back and maybe add support for the reformatter to not convert it to the literal array #(3 #+ 4) .
>>
>> I do not know in fact this is why I asked :)
>> Now may be my idea to use pragma to get something like pythondoctest is a bad idea
>> but I really want to have literal programming.
>> What do you think?
>>
> I like the idea to show examples/tests close to code, but pragmas are not really good...
>
>> If we have ' ' then it would be good that the syntax higlighter works with a special mode inside the ' '
>
> it is just a string. How do you know that it contains code?
>
> Would you highlight all string in all code as if it contained code? Or would you add this just for
> Pragmas? But even there, strings are string, not code.
>
> I think we can conclude that pragmas are not a good solution to the problem, as they are far
> too limited to express code.
I second that.
Furthermore, typical examples require more than one liners, and these should be factored out separately.
Cheers,
Doru
>
>�� �� �� ��Marcus
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."