The author of the test is Andreas Raab, but I'm not sure who found it (excavating mailing list is hard work)2013/10/25 Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com>
On 25 October 2013 00:26, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
Still, I do not see how you get the errorSubscriptBound:...Hard to debug this kind of code :(This is reproducible on Squeak wiht on:do:, so on:fork: bizareness apart, this is another flaw in exception handling, along with wrong handler for nested exception (testHandlerFromAction below), unless it's an avatar.
In Squeak that would mean that you sent #handleSignal: to a not isHandlerContext ContextPart...
I never saw this, but if Eliot says so...
ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction
"A test ensuring that nested exceptions work as expected."
| result |
result := [
[
[self error: 'trigger error'] on: ZeroDivide do: [ :ex | 'inner' ]
] on: Error do: [ :ex | 3 / 0 ]
] on: ZeroDivide do: [ :ex | 'outer' ].
self assert: 'outer' equals: result description: 'Incorrect handler'.2013/10/24 Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com>ok, it seems i found how to reproduce the situation with following:
[ [ 1/0 ] ensure: [ nil foo ] ] on: Error fork: [ :ex | 1halt ]you will get halt, and if you close the debugger , it will throw unwind error.(while instead it should throw DNU)
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.