On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:40, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Hi,

Indeed, they are not ready for the dark theme.

As for Pharo-ready, I would rather take the opportunity to create a set of icons that are Pharo specific. I can try to play with that.

@Esteban: could you point me to where I should look for the currently used icons?

current icons are in: EclipseUIThemeIcons and around. 
but I���m starting to refactorise all that monolithic crap we have now. 
I was just now discussing an idea (more or less same we discussed before around themes) to solve this (still not completely done���)

Esteban 


Cheers,
Doru

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
No, they are not "Pharo ready" in general. I'm working in a change proposal...



On 3 Oct 2014, at 09:30, "phil@highoctane.be" <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:

Question about those icons, are they DarkTheme ready? I have had to invert them all by hand to have something looking nice (and do all kinds of changes to be able to read the contents).

Also, as GT is using Rubric, the default black/dark text has to be turned into white as well as the cursor color in order to see something.

Phil

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
On a separate note, I played with another variation of a go icon that would be more specific to Pharo. Would you like this better?

<go-icon.png>

Cheers,
Doru



On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
I understand. But, even now, you associated Cmd+i as a window action. Is it a stretch to see it as a logical action that materializes in different ways?

Doru

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
well, but that���s something that *now* you cannot do. 
what people will see now is ���cmd+i does one thing in playground, and other thing in other parts of the system". 
For me, that���s not coherent, and introduces a level of pain. 
We are still trying to fix the annoying introduced by nautilus because commands are different on it than the rest of the system��� I would like to avoid that. 

Esteban

On 03 Oct 2014, at 08:17, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Hi,

What if you see it like this: Cmd+i inspects. If you can inspect in place, you do it, otherwise, you inspect in a new window. I know it would require a bit of getting used to, but imagine what will happen when the class browser will allow you to inspect in place ... oops, perhaps I should have not say it loud :)

Cheers,
Doru



On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
yes, because it will be "open panel" in playground and "popup an inspector" everyplace else. 

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Why do you think that the "Cmd+i" option introduces incoherence?

Doru

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
you have to pay attention to other lists other than moose, Alex :)
nah, seriously: we have been discussing on a remap, because it is conflicting with other keybindings we have in pharo (cmd+o+[others]).

For now, we have three proposals:

cmd+e ���execute���
cmd+g ���go���
cmd+i, and remap gtinspector to cmd+I

personally I prefer the second one.
the third one looks like a good idea, but it will introduce an incoherence in the system (unless we remap everything, everywhere), so I prefer to stick with ���cmd+g���

Esteban

> On 02 Oct 2014, at 23:28, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
>
> It does in the moose image. Pity, this is so useful...
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>





--

"Every thing has its own flow"




--

"Every thing has its own flow"




--

"Every thing has its own flow"



--

"Every thing has its own flow"




--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"