Hmm, can't get it to work. Now I have problems to get the method extensions into the package. Because of the Petitxpath being written lower case I had to remove the working copy. I created a new package with the letters in proper upper-/lowercase. The changes diff looks ok now but method extensions are not be part of the package. If I write the package and look at them use the "browse" button in monticello browser I can see that they are not included in the package.On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:Am 20.02.2013 um 11:17 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:there is a problem with the package definition, I think (PetitXPath != Petitxpath), and new RPackage cannot detect they are the same... in fact, IMO that exposes an old PackageInfo bug, not an RPackage problem, so I think the real solution is to commit a package with a good package name.So, what are the rules. Does the case sensitivity also reflect in method extensions? Meaning do I need to call the extension *petitXPath or even *PetitXPath?nono, method extensions remains the same (case insensitive). What I mean is that I made a mistake when I create the PetitXPath package originally (I committed with a bad mc name)... that's the origin of your problem now (yep, once again, my fault :).But it shouldn't happen with other well-formed packages. And in my opinion, best way to proceed is to create a package as it should be and re-commit, because is not a MC problem, nor an RPackage problem, is a problem with that specific package.
Yeah, I made the screenshot with an older image. I retried it then with updating the image first. But seeing that the result ist the same made me send the old screenshot.Also, it does not looks like you have the lastest image... you should be seeing something like this:fiuuuuu... I was worried :)EstebanNorbert<Screen Shot 2013-02-20 at 11.15.07 AM.png>(notice the diff morph has a bar in the middle, also two text label on top).On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:I opened a fresh pharo 2 (#20559) and loaded PetitXPath. Modifying a method does not mark the package dirty in monticello browser. And If I press the "changes" button I can see<Bildschirmfoto 2013-02-20 um 11.00.54.png>That basically shows all the code that is in the package. But from my own change I cannot see anything in there.Norbert