On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
That is why we talk about Pharo as a cool, modern environment and language that is Smalltalk-inspired.We went through this a few months ago. ��Pharo����isn't inspired by Smalltalk; it /is/ a Smalltalk. �� Trying to be mealy-mouthed about it and claiming inspiration, rather than proudly declaring its a Smalltalk is IMO as bad as apologizing for it being dead. ��We do not need to apologize because Pharo was never dead :).We don't need to avoid the S word either...��Doru--On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Am 28.04.2014 um 18:58 schrieb kilon alios <kilon.alios@gmail.com>:+1��very cool presentation. Definitely you need to add this to the new website.��Question : Why in every presentation we have to apologise why smalltalk is dead / extinct ? ����As a newcomer to Smalltalk I find it quite annoying. Its not as if I came to Smalltalk without knowing that is not popular. The vast majority of languages out there are so more unpopular than Smalltalk, yet they don't have this "sorry that I am dead" mentality to them.��Well said.NorbertOn Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
��� more a Smalltalk one using Pharo:
MountainWest RubyConf 2014
Noel Rappin: "But Really, You Should Learn Smalltalk���
Smalltalk has mystique. We talk about it more than we use it. It seems like it should be so similar to Ruby. It has similar Object-Oriented structures, it even has blocks. But everything is so slightly different, from the programming environment, to the 1-based arrays, to the simple syntax. Using Smalltalk will make you look at familiar constructs with new eyes. We���ll show you how to get started on Smalltalk, and walk through some sample code. Live coding may be involved. You���ll never look at objects the same way again.
�� �� �� �� http://www.confreaks.com/videos/3284-mwrc-but-really-you-should-learn-smalltalk
"Every thing has its own flow"--
best,Eliot