Sean P. DeNigris wrote:

Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
> Hmm, strange. �There are two implementations of this method in my image.
> One in KMShortcut and one in KMNoShortcut, one does nothing (on purpose
> with a comment :P) but the other has an implementation :/...
>

I may not be understanding correctly, but they seem backwards (i.e.
NoShortcut is doing something and Shortcut is not). Although (see below)...

Haha!� You are right :).� Since I introduced the concept of defaultShortcuts vs current shortcuts, that was meaningless!� I only had to replace the defaultShortcut without doing any of that.

Thanks!
Guille, hungry of feedback :)