On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
It would be cool if it didn't take 3+ hours to load. �2.8 is much more reasonable. �Is 3 that much bigger, or is something wrong with the configuration?



Yes, it cannot take 3 hours. In my case, it takes no more than 15 minutes. Stan: the old machine was with Windows? do you have any antivirus working like NOD32 or something like that ?


-----Original Message-----
From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Stan Shepherd
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:38 AM
To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1



Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stan Shepherd
> <stan.shepherd414@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The only concern is that it took some hours
>
>
> hours ? seriously ?
>
>
>> to download and install Seaside
>> (albeit on a slow spare PC). And with occassional network glitches, I
>> had to restart a method a few times from a debugger.
>

Yes, it was 3 hr 29m on the old machine, but I don't know what percent it was halted due to network glitches. It would be really cool if it made say 3 retries when its HTTP gets failed.

I ran overnight on main machine (Ubuntu 9.04, 3 GHz dual core 1GB ram, nominal 7Gb internet but other downloads running) with message tally - 71 minutes.

...Stan

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312p4284552.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project