Yep, very good example of faked quality.

Making changes at the rate of Pharo is demanding and I understand the will to by-pass some quality rules. But then, any one wanting to give lessons should observe the real usage of the bug tracker and think again, because this is far from being an isolated case.

Nicolas

2013/4/5 Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com>

On 5 April 2013 17:29, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> There does not seem to be any description in the issue tracker either, or maybe I missed it.
>
indeed, the record on issue tracker looks very informative. (in the attached).

>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 30022
>> -----
>>
>> 10032 Integrate new debugger
>> � � � � https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10032
>>
>> Diff information:
>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/DebuggerModel-EstebanLorenzano.23
>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Debugger-EstebanLorenzano.33
>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.