On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Marcus Denker
<marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On May 30, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
> Regarding this subject I think:
>
> � � � � There's impossible to authoritatively classify anything as "dead code" unless there's a reference standard of what's core and what's not core (like, Java defines the JFCs). At this point it would be useful to have a reference standard of "core classes" and their "core messages/methods".
>
We do not have such a reference. I do not know how you can build one without cleaning up.