I have never seen ReToDoRule to suggest a change that I wanted to do.
I think it tries to detect if there is #at: send to the collection inside the block and suggests to use more high-level iterators.
But the suggestions are odd and it seems to be too naive with just detecting the #at: message send to the iterated value.
"Checks for use of to:do: when a do:, with:do: or timesRepeat: when should be used.���
��� #timesRepeat: does not take an argument for the block with the running index, so it is not a replacement
��� with:do: is not a replacement for to:do: ? it would mean creating first a collection and then iterating
��� using do: on an interval is bad, we even have a rule against that: ReUnoptimizedToDoRule
Maybe I am missing something?
The rule ReToDoCollectRule seems to be working nicely, though.
Issue tracker entry:
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/11162