On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:2015-11-06 16:17 GMT+01:00 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:Hi guys,I have a very large kind of "rule engine" in which rules are written in smalltalk. These rules are saved as domain objects (imagine a rule kind of object) which end up having a closure. The code of those closure most of the time receives an argument and send messages to it.��I want to add automatic method rename for rules. Let's say i have plenty of rules sending the message (rule) #price and now I want to refactor all senders to actually send #lastPrice.I am taking a look to��RBRenameMethodRefactoring and friends. But I wonder if there is something specifically for managing blocks rather than methods/classes?Just write a RBParseTreeRewriter rule with specific elements to only activate inside blocks.Thanks Thierry, �� that helped me to get started. Note that all my closures are clean (#isClean answering true, that is, they are all self contained), and I also have the 'string' of them. So I have no problem to just re generate them :)So this kind of worked:| rewriter tree oldSeletor newSelector |"next: build the method-like string out of our closure strings"tree := RBParser parseMethod: 'DoIt ^ [:proxy |��proxy at: #oldSelector.proxy oldSelector.��proxy oldSelectorAnotherMethod.proxy do: ''oldSelectorAndSomething''."a comment with #oldSelector ��"]'.oldSeletor := #oldSelector.��newSelector := #newSelector.oldSeletor numArgs > 0 ifTrue: [ self error: 'For the moment we only support renaming selectors without arguments'].rewriter := RBParseTreeRewriter replaceLiteral: oldSeletor with: newSelector.��rewriter��replace: '``@object ' , oldSeletorwith: '``@object ' , newSelector.rewriter executeTree: tree.tree ��newSourceAnd that answers:'DoIt ^ [:proxy |��proxy at: #newSelector.proxy newSelector.��proxy oldSelectorAnotherMethod.proxy do: ''oldSelectorAndSomething''."a comment with #oldSelector ��"]'��
Or a cascade: a RBParseTreeSearcher which matches blocks; on each block node you activate a rewriter.However, there is an issue in rewriting blocks contents, because it supposes that the method defining the block is recompiled; it's significantly harder to make changes to the code of live blocks (change the bytescode itself? What if the block has multiples instances?).Thierry��If not, I think my easiest path is to automatically compile dummy/temporal ��classes/methods from the rules, perform the refactor, then move source from methods to block closures, and finally remove created classes.��Any pointer is appreciated.best,��--