I just looked at 1.4 and it looks simpler but OCompletion works great for me! I think is a great tool but it's not well integrated (cause there's been a lot of changes, new editors and yada yada yada)

IMHO it does't hurt to have them (you can disable it and use ECompletion instead or you can even disable both tools)�and makes Pharo more friendly to newcomers from others IDEs.�

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:

On 28 August 2011 21:18, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
>
> Damien Cassou wrote:
>>
>>
>
> Cool! That would make a big difference. Where are they/what are they called?

I know of Roel Wuyts' RoelTyper
(http://decomp.ulb.ac.be/roelwuyts/smalltalk/roeltyper/) and Lex
Spoon's Chuck (http://www.lexspoon.org/ti/). Matt Might has also
written about k-CFA (Control Flow Analysis) for inferring types in a
dynamic language (Scheme, in particular) -
http://matt.might.net/articles/implementation-of-kcfa-and-0cfa/ -
which we might be able to apply to Smalltalk.

frank

> Sean
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-1-4-tp3759684p3774973.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>