________________________________________

De : Pharo-dev [pharo-dev-bounces@lists.pharo.org] de la part de Marcus Denker [marcus.denker@inria.fr]
Envoy� : mardi 27 mai 2014 09:58
� : Pharo Development List
Objet : Re: [Pharo-dev] is ClassOrganization>>#categories right?

On 27 May 2014, at 01:57, Ben Coman <btc@openInWorld.com> wrote:

> GOUBIER Thierry wrote:
>> In my own code, I allways use ClassOrganization>>#realCategories to avoid getting the --all-- category. I consider the --all-- category to be a GUI artifact, not a class organization concept.
>>
>> I'd prefer a #protocols (without the --all-- category, of course :)) so ok for deprecating #categories.
>>
> +1 for #protocols

returning protocol objects, not symbols�

Up to you, just that it is consistent... protocol objects everywhere, or symbols everywhere. #categories for symbols, #protocols for protocol objects (and #addCategory: for symbols, #addProtocol: for protocols, and so on...).

A subject for the Pharo Sprint planned by Serge in Paris in two weeks time ?

Thierry

Marcus