icon design and web design are two very different things.��

I seriously doubt we can get the icon set we need as cheap as you might think.��

but��� we can always try :)

Esteban

On 24 Apr 2015, at 14:55, phil@highoctane.be wrote:

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, stepharo��<stepharo@free.fr>��wrote:

Le 24/4/15 11:06,��phil@highoctane.be��a ��crit��:

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe��<sven@stfx.eu>��wrote:

That's a bit harsh, the fonts are the same ;-)
And it is of course possible that you don't like it, it is a matter of taste.
The contrast thing is also taste, but for some people it solve certain vision problems.

Exactly.

When you have floaters all day long, the last thing you want is a f*cking white screen.

Now, I am using 3.0 with DawnTheme, which is more like SublimeText (in a 3.0).

I tried the 4.0 and it is nice. Now, icons should get a pass because the artefacts on the edges are not nice.

If there is some little petty cash available, that's the kind of job that can be done supercheap on something like��https://en.99designs.be/. That would be good use of consortium/association money for example.

Why bother with graphics work when you can get things done professionaly for close to nil?

do you know the people?
Because I would really be in favor getting people doing this job.

This is a large community.

One can get a full website design done for around $500.

Got that done and was nice work.

Alternatives (used too):��https://www.freelancer.com/

Phil��

Phil

��

��

> On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:27, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
>
> That's funny because I tried it two days ago the first time and I didn't like it. I had troubles to get anything but bitmap fonts. After setting all things up I was a bit disappointed that contrast wise it doesn't work for me. Can someone send a screenshot with one setup that he/she considers good?
>
> thanks,
>
> Norbert
>
>> Am 24.04.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I disagree��� DarkTheme is just for certain tastes, while regular one, while probably dated, is more ���standard���.
>> Also, DarkTheme is not ready. yeah, yeah��� it works and works fine most of the time��� but not *all* the time (take for example find string dialog��� I never found the time to fix it, and nobody complained so��� :P). Finally. we need to adopt SVG icons (in my TODO list since a couple of months, I will deliver soon, I hope), otherwise they do not look good (this is a problem eclipse itself had it��� we are just inheriting it :) )
>>
>> But a good question would be: How can we push forward our UI, besides using a darker or clearer theme?
>> I would like to hear some opinions here :)
>>
>> Esteban
>>
>>
>>> On 24 Apr 2015, at 08:33, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> comments about color is to be taken with care.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 24/4/15 02:48, Sean P. DeNigris a ��crit :
>>>> Why didn't/don't we make it the default for 4.0? Everyone seems to love it,
>>>> and people are commenting that the UI looks dated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Sean
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:��http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html
>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>