Am 13.01.2018 um 05:22 schrieb Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>:

Hi Stephane,

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:26 AM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi torsten

we have a super long list of *important* fixes and enhancements to do.

Isn't it important to preserve the ability to exchange code between Pharo, Squeak and Cuis?  Don't you care that the VM development is directly affected by this?  Is the VM and plugin support not important to Pharo?
 
Sure it is important. If you would ask if anyone considers this as not important you���ll have a hard time finding many. That is not the point. If everyone stays in its own personal context and judges from there it is obvious that most decisions outside look non-sense from there. 
This community is about collaboration. And collaboration does not mean that everyone understands everyone else���s decision. It means that if you don���t understand a decision from someone you still be able to believe he has good reason to do so.

my 2 cents,

Norbert


Stef

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
> Not having timestamps/authors in Pharo 7 due to git and missing blame support
> (see [1]) has other bad side effects:
>
>
>  - it clobbers all method stamps in an MCZ package [1] if you use Monticello
>    which can lead easily to trouble/lamenting
>
>  - it is not possible to fileout a changeset [2] in the ChangeSorter
>
> Was there any further discussion/decision for P7 on solving this
> or adding blame support?
>
> Thx
> T.
>
>
> [1] http://forum.world.st/Author-name-in-version-Iceberg-td4968472.html
> [2] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2018-January/026350.html
> [3] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20951/
>




-- 
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot