please please please take a look to the conversation we have with had with Eliot Miranda some time ago. His ideas were REALLY cool and interesting. yes, of course, that's much more than what we are saying here, but it is very interesting:

http://forum.world.st/Fwd-squeak-dev-Smalltalk-vs-Eclipse-tp1295122p1295122.html

Cheers

Mariano

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Geoffroy Couprie <geo.couprie@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 May 2010 02:22, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Why dont you use the VNC facility of Pharo which is
>> typically used to administrate Seaside images:
>>
>> �http://book.seaside.st/book/advanced/deployment/maintaining/vnc
>>
>> Just install the RFB package, configure and use a normal
>> VNC client to remotely use and drive the image.
>>
>> So you have workspaces, debuggers, you name it, ...
>>
> Remote debugging is a must. Headless, no UI.
> Remote debugger can create own UI at debugger side, while debugged
> image could be quite small,
> contain no UI, Morphic & rest of stuff.
>
> Think of debugging a kernel images, where you can't afford having a
> lot of stuff loaded, not saying about RFB.
>

I like the idea of a headless image :)

I don't know how hard it would be to add a remote debugger. Could it
be done by catching the exceptions on the remote side and sending
commands like walking the stack from the local side?

For remote administration, it would be fairly easy to have a local UI
sending commands periodically to remote VMs to ask for status, execute
some code, etc.

Best regards,

Geoffroy

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project