On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:

2010/5/17 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:

>
>
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:16 PM, St�phane Ducasse
> <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>>
>> check the network problem.
>> But we can release rc1 anytime now.
>>
>
> No, please. We are not in a RC yet. We should first go as alpha, then beta
> and finally RC.
> We cannot go in a RC with the first build ever.
>

Yes , we can. Its only a conventions, what you calling alpha , beta or RC.
But sure thing, more testing and packaging won't hurt.

But conventions are important. Listen the name: RELEASE CANDIDATE!

Imagine you are going to download a software which is in RELEASE CANDIDATE and has a lot of problems and bugs....is not good for marketing.
So...they are just conventions, but they are important. We cannot say this is a release candidate when we haven't even ever created a PharoDev.

For example, did you test it?�� We are not speaking about core.

�

> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
>
>>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project