On 5 Aug 2017, at 11:14, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

On 5 Aug 2017, at 11:06, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 10:49:02AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

I think there is a consensus we need to keep #cr and #lf as intended,
yet to add some kind of #newLine (which btw is different to EOL :P)
vocabulary, isn???t?

In this, I favour Peter approach for define line ending convention
(the way #newLine will work)??? and of course by default it should use
the one from the current platform. 

anything agains this approach?

Esteban

+1

I prefer #nl to #newLine, but admit that it is a subjective preference
and that descriptive names are generally better.

heh, me too... but is a bit cryptic.

#nl
   "Insert the platform dependent end of line character.
   For people that haven't got used to terminal communications rising
   above 9600baud"

   ^self newLine

:-)