Guille, I like the UI. Few comments:

- what is that KMMeta ? seems kryptic to me. Shortcuts have to be very clear and easy to understand. I really didn't understand at all :(
- what is the difference between '+' and ','� ?

Maybe a little help somewhere would be fine.
Ahhh and what about letting you type something and recognize the shortcut instead of writing it? heheh this is a good one ;)

cheers

mariano

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,� I would like to discuss the UI for shortcuts and not to impose it :). So..

I was exploring the Idea of configuring the shortcuts in settings as the screenshot shows.� What do you think of that?� I don't think we need a separated tool to configure shortcuts.� Settings look ok.

Tomorrow I'll be putting a lot of effort on it ;).

Cheers!

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:


On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
I also would like a cmd+f: search anything... but that needs also an application (like algernon, which I'm currently not supporting anymore due time issues), not just a command :(
well, at least a cmd+f: search class would be fine :)

+1
It sound like a good project for someone with time and wanting to learn :)
�

El 27/12/2010, a las 5:38a.m., St�phane Ducasse escribi�:

> I suggest that you define lists =
>
> simple eamcs bindings =
> � � � ctral a ctrle
>
> Windows manipulation
> � � � cmd W
> � � � ...
>
> Your special binding
>
>
> Then you should have contexts
> � � � World
> � � � TextMorph
> � � � Editor only
>
> � � � (of course some list will only be able to be attached to a given object programmatically
> � � � example: for botsinc I wanted specific binding to that morph class only -- but you do not care)
>
> then a config is
>
> � � � (lists, lists) context
> � � � (mybinding, lists, lists) context
>
> where , make sure that mybinding take precedence
>
>
> Does it make sense?
>
> Stef
>
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2010, at 2:37 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
>> What about something like the attach?
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wow, haha, this is wonderful! �So, putting some order:
>>
>> 1) shortcuts published as settings with a default? �Will that be ok? �This make me think the following:
>> - how to share shortcuts. Files? �Keymapping used to use SIXX, but maybe it is not suitable for a light solution (I don't know much about SIXX)
>> - downloading a new image (or a new version of a package with shortcuts) could make us lose our own-defined shortcuts.
>>
>> 2) support for the following shortcuts:
>>
>> - a shortcut to bring up the wolrd menu. Not sure which shortcut.
>> - use ctrl + tab �to switch between windows instead of cmd + arrows
>> - a shortcut for what it is (hidden) now with cmd + shift + click �(list of opened windows)
>> - Shortcuts for opening standard tools: Workspace, Transcript, TestRunner, etc.
>> - Shortcut for duplicating a windows
>> - a shortcut for saving the image (cmd+ shoft + s ?)
>> - a shortcut for quitting the image with and without saving
>> - a shortcut to see a list of shortcuts
>>
>> I would like to add some more items to #2, and to define the keys that triggers them.
>> #1 seems to be of some work :). �I'll work on it ASAP.
>>
>> Step by step, as Stef and Mostaza Merlo says :).
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Guille
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>> + 1 :)
>> And save them as configuration
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> my wishlist:
>>>
>>> - a shortcut to see all available shortcuts and change them
>>>
>>> + a lot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <PharoScreenshot.2.png>
>
>