Le 16/08/2015 22:48, Dimitris Chloupis a ��crit :
> One of the things that annoy me is how many Configurations and Baselines
> pollute the package space that are of little interest to the user. It
> would be nice to group them and filter them out of Nautilus unless user
> asks for them.

This is what AltBrowser does. All configurations are in a category named
'Configurations' and all Baselines are in a category named 'Baselines'.
Unless you really search for it, you won't see it.

> I really like this new approach great work.

It certainly help.

I have played a bit with extracting info from Configurations to classify
automagically, but it doesn't work very well.

Thierry

> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:34 PM stepharo <stepharo@free.fr
> <mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote:
>
>
>
>�� �� ��Le 16/8/15 17:00, Sean P. DeNigris a ��crit :
>�� �� �� > stepharo wrote
>�� �� �� >> you get a project (group) with all your packages together ready
>�� �� ��to work ;)
>�� �� �� > Cool! I feel more and more that the standard "Package" pane is
>�� �� ��only useful
>�� �� �� > for... packaging, and when one takes off the dependency
>�� �� ��management hat and
>�� �� �� > puts the user hat on (i.e. most of the time), what you really
>�� �� ��want there is
>�� �� �� > a logical view of the system. So I see three use cases:
>�� �� �� > - Logical view of the system - I guess this was the original
>�� �� ��intention of
>�� �� �� > Categories, but has been hijacked by Monticello
>�� �� �� > - By project - which, as you just showed, we have now, yay!
>�� �� �� > - By package - the least useful, but primary (up til now), view
>
>�� �� ��Indeed.
>�� �� ��We will see what we get at the end but may be something like
>
>�� �� �� �� �� ��MyProject
>�� �� �� �� �� ��AnotherProject
>�� �� �� �� �� ��System
>�� �� �� �� �� ��LowLevel
>
>�� �� ��And people will not be overwhelmed by hundreds of nice packages. :)
>
>�� �� ��I think that touching package contents under the assumption that the
>�� �� ��package list is too long in the UI
>�� �� ��is the wrong way to look at the problem.
>�� �� �� �� �� ��Packages are unit of deployment and we need Projects - unit of
>�� �� ��knowledge. And the UI should shows both
>�� �� �� �� �� ��depending on the view we want to get.
>
>�� �� ��Stef
>�� �� �� >
>�� �� �� >
>�� �� �� >
>�� �� �� > -----
>�� �� �� > Cheers,
>�� �� �� > Sean
>�� �� �� > --
>�� �� �� > View this message in context:
>�� �� ��http://forum.world.st/Projects-are-slowly-getting-to-live-and-tp4843277p4843286.html
>�� �� �� > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
>�� �� ��Nabble.com.
>�� �� �� >
>�� �� �� >
>�� �� �� >
>
>